This is the headline to this article from Sky News
Teen Child Rapist Who Struck Again Named
Here is an extract from the article;
A teenager who was jailed for sexually assaulting a nine-year-old girl while already on bail after raping a 10-year-old girl has been named.
Why in god's name was he on bail for rape, of a 10 year old, in the first place?
What were they thinking letting a sex attacker, of young girls, out on the streets again.
Didn't they think he might attack someone else. Don't they think rape is a serious crime any more?
Another extract from the article;
On Monday, Heaton was ordered to serve a minimum of five years behind bars at Liverpool Crown Court for the "truly chilling" ordeal he subjected on his victims.
After two sex attacks, one of them a rape, they give him five, yes that's right 5 years.
He should be in jail for at the very least 15 - 20 years, before he is even up for parole.
What if he is still a danger to the public after the five years, will they still let him out?
They probably would because it will be against his (in) human rights.
This is a another extract from the article;
His identity has now been revealed after Judge David Harris QC ended a legal delay, which had been placed to ensure security could be installed to protect the boy from his prison inmates.
'Protect the boy from his prison inmates'.
The victims may not of got proper justice, but from what i have heard there is nothing like justice given out by fellow prisoners to sick twisted monsters like this scum.