A few months ago i wrote this blog about how Britain is being ruled by Europe.
Well i have just read this article in the Times.
A quote from the article;
A key element of the Government’s anti-terror laws was declared illegal today because it breaches human rights.
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that sweeping powers allowing police to stop and search people without having grounds of suspecting their involvement in terrorism are illegal.
This ruling is more proof that the UK isn't allowed to do anything without the ok from the EU and the human rights court.
Does anyone remember V for Vendetta.
This is just a blog about my opinions on what is going on in my country be it local or national.
Showing posts with label Sovereign State. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sovereign State. Show all posts
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
Friday, 18 December 2009
Copenhagen Climate Conference
I have been watching and reading about the climate conference these last two weeks and I have seen some things that worry me.
The main reason for the conference is to stop or reduce the effects of climate change (global warming), whether you believe in climate change or not that is another argument.
All i have seen is developed nations, like the US and the UK, desperately wanting to give billions of taxpayers money (OUR MONEY) into a global fund for climate change, and also saying they will reduce CO2 output by ridiculous amounts.
You have the developing nations, like China and India, being told that they must invest in renewable energy sources and not to use their own natural resouces like coal, but the developed nations would help them with money from this global fund.
Then we have the poor nations, who just want as much money as they can get from the global fund. Not because they want to invest it in renewable energy and to build up their country, but just so the leaders and their supporters can keep as much of the money for themselves.
Then we have the scientific research behind the IPCC. I'm no scientist but from what i have read on the subject there is still some doubt on the exact causes of climate change and if global warming is actually happening.
What i would expect is scientists on both sides debating it at the conference, but all i have seen is scientist and other people who are skeptics of climate change being refused entry or denied to ask questions on the subject to scientists and speakers at the conference.
Are they hiding something from us, or are they that afraid of debating the subject in case someone asks the wrong question?
Before this conference i wouldn't of put myself in either camp, if i am honest i was slightly with the skeptics, but after all that i have seen at the conference and the research i have done myself on the internet and the library i am definitely a skeptic.
All i ever wanted was the truth, but from what i have seen and read the IPCC scientists, world governments and the green movement don't want to here anything other than the world is heating up, the seas will rise 20 feet in the next 100 years, the North and South Poles are melting and that humans are the only reason for climate change.
This reminds me of the old Soviet Union where if someone spoke out against the government or communism they were taken away and never heard from again.
We live in a democracy, or are meant to, and it looks like we are being denied our right to free speech.
What with the UK being part of the EU, which is an unelected body, and now people being unable to speak out against something that clearly isn't 100% proven is very worrying indeed.
I maybe wrong, but i believe we are on a slope towards something that people died for in there thousands to prevent.
Anyone remember WORLD WAR I AND WORLD WAR II.
The main reason for the conference is to stop or reduce the effects of climate change (global warming), whether you believe in climate change or not that is another argument.
All i have seen is developed nations, like the US and the UK, desperately wanting to give billions of taxpayers money (OUR MONEY) into a global fund for climate change, and also saying they will reduce CO2 output by ridiculous amounts.
You have the developing nations, like China and India, being told that they must invest in renewable energy sources and not to use their own natural resouces like coal, but the developed nations would help them with money from this global fund.
Then we have the poor nations, who just want as much money as they can get from the global fund. Not because they want to invest it in renewable energy and to build up their country, but just so the leaders and their supporters can keep as much of the money for themselves.
Then we have the scientific research behind the IPCC. I'm no scientist but from what i have read on the subject there is still some doubt on the exact causes of climate change and if global warming is actually happening.
What i would expect is scientists on both sides debating it at the conference, but all i have seen is scientist and other people who are skeptics of climate change being refused entry or denied to ask questions on the subject to scientists and speakers at the conference.
Are they hiding something from us, or are they that afraid of debating the subject in case someone asks the wrong question?
Before this conference i wouldn't of put myself in either camp, if i am honest i was slightly with the skeptics, but after all that i have seen at the conference and the research i have done myself on the internet and the library i am definitely a skeptic.
All i ever wanted was the truth, but from what i have seen and read the IPCC scientists, world governments and the green movement don't want to here anything other than the world is heating up, the seas will rise 20 feet in the next 100 years, the North and South Poles are melting and that humans are the only reason for climate change.
This reminds me of the old Soviet Union where if someone spoke out against the government or communism they were taken away and never heard from again.
We live in a democracy, or are meant to, and it looks like we are being denied our right to free speech.
What with the UK being part of the EU, which is an unelected body, and now people being unable to speak out against something that clearly isn't 100% proven is very worrying indeed.
I maybe wrong, but i believe we are on a slope towards something that people died for in there thousands to prevent.
Anyone remember WORLD WAR I AND WORLD WAR II.
Sunday, 6 December 2009
Is This The Start of Things to Come?
Stitch-up? Now France excludes Britain from special talks on EU farm spending
France has triggered a fresh row over EU power-broking by excluding Britain from key-Europe wide talks on the future of farm subsidies to be held in Paris this week.
Well, well, well, It didn't take long did it.
Here is a quote from the article;
The French government has summoned a meeting of what it called the "G22" - senior ministers from 22 European states - in an attempt to influence a rethink of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).
However, it has not invited Britain or other so-called "reform nations" - the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Malta - all of which have argued for a full overhaul of EU farm subsidies.
Bruno Le Maire, the French agriculture minister, said the aim was to "produce a battle plan to defend a strong common agriculture policy, to support a renewed CAP."
You can read the full Article here.
This might be a one off, but in my opinion i don't think so.
I wonder what will happen next?
France has triggered a fresh row over EU power-broking by excluding Britain from key-Europe wide talks on the future of farm subsidies to be held in Paris this week.
Well, well, well, It didn't take long did it.
Here is a quote from the article;
The French government has summoned a meeting of what it called the "G22" - senior ministers from 22 European states - in an attempt to influence a rethink of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).
However, it has not invited Britain or other so-called "reform nations" - the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Malta - all of which have argued for a full overhaul of EU farm subsidies.
Bruno Le Maire, the French agriculture minister, said the aim was to "produce a battle plan to defend a strong common agriculture policy, to support a renewed CAP."
You can read the full Article here.
This might be a one off, but in my opinion i don't think so.
I wonder what will happen next?
Thursday, 17 September 2009
Is Britain a sovereign state?
Over the years i have been reading about the EU and how it has changed the UK.
I would love to know who actually governs us, is it the Government in the House of Commons or is it through Brussels?
How many laws (or regulations when they want to slide it in through the back door) is Britain governed by that actually come from Brussels?
I don't think we can pass a law now without making sure it doesn't go against one from Brussels. For example, any police force in europe can make an arrest warrants for anyone in the EU and the local force, in another country, has to arrest them and send them to the country that issued the warrant.
If we were a sovereign state i don't believe that Should happen, they would have to go through the courts to extradite that person.
Back in 1972 when Ted Heath signed us up to the common market, did he know that what he was signing was not a trade agreement, but something that would eventually become a monster swallowing countries up, sometimes against the majority of certain country's population. e.g. France, Holland, The Irish and i am pretty sure that the UK population would say no to it.
When i started my working life, i was taken round the place of work and i was told what to do and shown the safety aspect of where i was working and i remembered it and that was that. I knew when to wear safety goggles and a hard hat etc.
Now you have to write out risk assessments for everything, but nearly everything is common sense.
There are four files that any new employee has to read (at my place of work) so he knows what the risk of working here is. Then he has to sign it to say he has read it.
This is a prime example of what companies have had to do, that i have seen over the years.
Have you read on a packet of peanuts, under the allergy information, 'may contain nuts'. Also on a carton of milk it reads ' may contain milk'.
How stupid is it when the food item says milk or peaNUTs on the front of the item, but still has to put it down on the allergy information.
When did we lose our common sense, i know i have still got it, but it looks like someone somewhere thinks we don't have any.
I am worried for the future of this country.
Will we still be called Great Britain or the UK in the future or will we be just a province in a state called the EU?
I would love to know who actually governs us, is it the Government in the House of Commons or is it through Brussels?
How many laws (or regulations when they want to slide it in through the back door) is Britain governed by that actually come from Brussels?
I don't think we can pass a law now without making sure it doesn't go against one from Brussels. For example, any police force in europe can make an arrest warrants for anyone in the EU and the local force, in another country, has to arrest them and send them to the country that issued the warrant.
If we were a sovereign state i don't believe that Should happen, they would have to go through the courts to extradite that person.
Back in 1972 when Ted Heath signed us up to the common market, did he know that what he was signing was not a trade agreement, but something that would eventually become a monster swallowing countries up, sometimes against the majority of certain country's population. e.g. France, Holland, The Irish and i am pretty sure that the UK population would say no to it.
When i started my working life, i was taken round the place of work and i was told what to do and shown the safety aspect of where i was working and i remembered it and that was that. I knew when to wear safety goggles and a hard hat etc.
Now you have to write out risk assessments for everything, but nearly everything is common sense.
There are four files that any new employee has to read (at my place of work) so he knows what the risk of working here is. Then he has to sign it to say he has read it.
This is a prime example of what companies have had to do, that i have seen over the years.
Have you read on a packet of peanuts, under the allergy information, 'may contain nuts'. Also on a carton of milk it reads ' may contain milk'.
How stupid is it when the food item says milk or peaNUTs on the front of the item, but still has to put it down on the allergy information.
When did we lose our common sense, i know i have still got it, but it looks like someone somewhere thinks we don't have any.
I am worried for the future of this country.
Will we still be called Great Britain or the UK in the future or will we be just a province in a state called the EU?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)