The following was found on IanPJ Twitter.
Have a read of this article from Reuters.
Merkel says German multiculturalism has failed
(Reuters) - Germany's attempt to create a multicultural society has "utterly failed," Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Saturday, adding fuel to a debate over immigration and Islam polarising her conservative camp.
Speaking to a meeting of young members of her Christian Democrats (CDU), Merkel said allowing people of different cultural backgrounds to live side by side without integrating had not worked in a country that is home to some four million Muslims.
"This (multicultural) approach has failed, utterly failed," Merkel told the meeting in Potsdam, south of Berlin.
Merkel faces pressure from within her CDU to take a tougher line on immigrants who don't show a willingness to adapt to German society and her comments appeared intended to pacify her critics.
She said too little had been required of immigrants in the past and repeated her usual line that they should learn German in order to get by in school and have opportunities on the labour market.
The debate over foreigners in Germany has shifted since former central banker Thilo Sarrazin published a book accusing Muslim immigrants of lowering the intelligence of German society.
Sarrazin was censured for his views and dismissed from the Bundesbank, but his book proved highly popular and polls showed a majority of Germans agreed with the thrust of his arguments.
Merkel has tried to accommodate both sides of the debate, talking tough on integration but also telling Germans that they must accept that mosques have become part of their landscape.
She said on Saturday that the education of unemployed Germans should take priority over recruiting workers from abroad, while noting Germany could not get by without skilled foreign workers.
In a weekend newspaper interview, her Labour Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU) raised the possibility of lowering barriers to entry for some foreign workers in order to fight the lack of skilled workers in Europe's largest economy.
"For a few years, more people have been leaving our country than entering it," she told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung. "Wherever it is possible, we must lower the entry hurdles for those who bring the country forward."
The German Chamber of Industry and Commerce (DIHK) says Germany lacks about 400,000 skilled workers.
Yet Horst Seehofer, chairman of the Christian Social Union (CSU), the CDU's sister party, has rejected any relaxation of immigration laws and said last week there was no room in Germany for more people from "alien cultures.
(Writing by Sarah Marsh; editing by Noah Barkin)
The German government sees what is happening when you have immigrants who don't adapt to the country's own culture, so why can't the British Government see the same?
The UK has had 13 years of uncontrolled immigration, and we have seen what happens; eg. Religious Extremism, human trafficking of women forced into prostitution.
Yes they are some of the worst cases, but it has increased in the last decade.
We do need controls, not just from outside the eu, but from inside the eu as well.
This is just a blog about my opinions on what is going on in my country be it local or national.
Showing posts with label Extremists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Extremists. Show all posts
Sunday, 17 October 2010
Thursday, 14 January 2010
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
Another Nail in the Coffin for Justice
A few days ago i wrote this blog about the seven muslim protesters disrupting a home coming parade by the Royal Anglian Regiment, and how they refused to stand up in court to show respect to the judge and the court.
Now the seven muslim men were found guilty.
Their punishment, a £500 fine. Which they admit we, the tax payer, will have to pay because all of them are on benefits.
You can read newspaper articles here, here and here
Here is an article of the damage they have caused to the community.
Judge Carolyn Mellanby has basically given the far right parties more ammunition and more followers to their cause.
It's not just this case, but many other criminal cases where people are found guilty of a crime and the sentence is just a joke.
Justice in this country is becoming a joke, if it isn't already.
Now the seven muslim men were found guilty.
Their punishment, a £500 fine. Which they admit we, the tax payer, will have to pay because all of them are on benefits.
You can read newspaper articles here, here and here
Here is an article of the damage they have caused to the community.
Judge Carolyn Mellanby has basically given the far right parties more ammunition and more followers to their cause.
It's not just this case, but many other criminal cases where people are found guilty of a crime and the sentence is just a joke.
Justice in this country is becoming a joke, if it isn't already.
Saturday, 9 January 2010
A lesson for Anjem Choudary
This article in the Daily Mail should show the British public what real British muslims are like. Completely opposite from the other muslims my previous blog.

The majority of British muslims are law abiding people who hate what Choudary is doing.
This is a quote from the article;
That is why the sight of Mr and Mrs Latif solemnly standing shoulder to shoulder with everyone else in Wootton Bassett should be drawn to everyone's attention. For their story is the story of real British Muslims, not the cataclysmic fantasy of an egomaniac like Choudary.
There is a lot of anti muslim feeling in this country, but the extremists are in the minority of the real muslim people.
There are extremists in all religions not just muslims. I just hope the law abiding muslims of this country rise up and stop the extremists like Choudary from turning young muslims against this country.
The majority of British muslims are law abiding people who hate what Choudary is doing.
This is a quote from the article;
That is why the sight of Mr and Mrs Latif solemnly standing shoulder to shoulder with everyone else in Wootton Bassett should be drawn to everyone's attention. For their story is the story of real British Muslims, not the cataclysmic fantasy of an egomaniac like Choudary.
There is a lot of anti muslim feeling in this country, but the extremists are in the minority of the real muslim people.
There are extremists in all religions not just muslims. I just hope the law abiding muslims of this country rise up and stop the extremists like Choudary from turning young muslims against this country.
Why weren't they charged with Contempt of Court?
If you are in a court of law and the judge walks in everyone must stand up to show respect to the court and the court officials.
If you don't you can be charged with contempt of court.
This article in the Telegraph has me wondering, how far will the judge give leeway to the accused.
Here is a quote from the article;
The accused are seven muslim men who are accused of disrupting the homecoming parade of the 2nd Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment last March. As the soldiers paraded through the town, the men were allegedly heard to shout: “British soldiers go to hell” and “They are killing babies”. They were also allegedly seen to display placards with slogans such as “Butchers of Basra” and “Cowards, Killers, Extremists”, and so face charges under the Public Order Act.
These men live in this country and they should abide by the laws of this country. They were arrested for breaking the laws of this country and are now on trial.
Here is the quote from the article that makes you wonder what will happen in this trial;
When the case opened, the accused refused to stand for Miss Mellanby. Their religion, they argued, forbids them to stand for anybody except Allah, and they were therefore unable to show their respect for the court’s officers in the customary manner.
What do you think the judge did next;
Did she charge them with contempt of court, or change hundreds of years of common law.
What she did was arrange it so the accused men would enter the court after the judge.
Now i ask you, WHY?
The last paragraph of the article says;
It’s up to District Judge Mellanby to decide whether these men are guilty of “threatening abusive or insulting behaviour”, and we, of course, expect that she will do so in a fair and proper manner. But we should keep an eye on the case, to see if she brings in any other radical legal innovations, overturning centuries of common law, in the process.
This case does make me uneasy. If she gives in on them not standing when she enters the court what else will she do?
If you don't you can be charged with contempt of court.
This article in the Telegraph has me wondering, how far will the judge give leeway to the accused.
Here is a quote from the article;
The accused are seven muslim men who are accused of disrupting the homecoming parade of the 2nd Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment last March. As the soldiers paraded through the town, the men were allegedly heard to shout: “British soldiers go to hell” and “They are killing babies”. They were also allegedly seen to display placards with slogans such as “Butchers of Basra” and “Cowards, Killers, Extremists”, and so face charges under the Public Order Act.
These men live in this country and they should abide by the laws of this country. They were arrested for breaking the laws of this country and are now on trial.
Here is the quote from the article that makes you wonder what will happen in this trial;
When the case opened, the accused refused to stand for Miss Mellanby. Their religion, they argued, forbids them to stand for anybody except Allah, and they were therefore unable to show their respect for the court’s officers in the customary manner.
What do you think the judge did next;
Did she charge them with contempt of court, or change hundreds of years of common law.
What she did was arrange it so the accused men would enter the court after the judge.
Now i ask you, WHY?
The last paragraph of the article says;
It’s up to District Judge Mellanby to decide whether these men are guilty of “threatening abusive or insulting behaviour”, and we, of course, expect that she will do so in a fair and proper manner. But we should keep an eye on the case, to see if she brings in any other radical legal innovations, overturning centuries of common law, in the process.
This case does make me uneasy. If she gives in on them not standing when she enters the court what else will she do?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)